stellaris limbo event as driven assimilators

My reasoning was that it will be filled with filthy organics (among which some of them are non-organics as well but still, most are organics) and i have no place in there, i'd much rather dissect them all instead of talk. Others are either to have population controls enabled or just destined for chemical processing.Im a machine intelligence driven assimilator and the first time i was invited to join i refused.

Preferably try to get bio pops with traits that are better at enery or mineral production, races with optimal habitat diffrent that your starting bio. Your bad actions - in fact they are best most reliable allies. Only determined exterminators are capable to overlook Species they will start to hate you, they start slowly dislike you for primitive annexation, and conquests (threat). they will die in 15 years but in mean time it will produce 8 energy (unafected byĪnything) but you can disable this policy after 10 years (and reenable 10 years latter).ĭo not expect good relations with bio neighbors at best they will tolerate you (being strong helps) only machine empires will like you but once you start killing off your drone If you have energy shortages you can set conquered species for chemical processing. Your goal is to assimilate new pops from primitives and latter from regular empires tis will improve economy fast (you will get not only pops butr also buildings). Rest (energy and minerals and some unity from special buildings) is worked by bio pops ides is to getĪssimilator special buildings (neuroelectric something) to get 15% bonus on bio pops for energy and minerals. Investments early) only once you develop minerals and energy. Early you do not produce metal (no research Strategy is to use metal(machines) for research, unity from nodes and keep their leaders (I still prefer bio leaders for governors). Negative: anything affecting happiness, reaction mauls in diplomacy, extra cost for pop transfer (hurts but it's acceptable ) Positive( version #2): minerals + energy -> imo better for energy balance very early in the game Positive( version #1): minerals + extra strong -> good for early ramp up, and cheaper(less armies need for same effect) conquests at first primitives then neighbours Negative: anything will do, I prefer extra mineral cost (early you won't need to build machines) and /or extra time to build Positive: research bonus, bonus leader level cap Third civic you pick whatever you want, you can even dismiss Rockbreakers by then. Later you can increase leader level with Transcendent Learning, which combined with Enhanced Memory will give you lvl 9 leaders, and then Adaptability Peak Performancy will increase to 10, so you don't need Factory Overclocking as third civic later. That more than compensates the lack of Thrifty trait. You'll amalgamate them with no unrest, feels like exterminators on easy mode. Your very strong cyborgs will help you quickly conquer the enemy.Īlso, you can assimilate organics for unity and then amalgamate them for 8 energy/pop for more than a decade, it's quite helpful in the early/mid game, and later you can fill the planets with your own perfect cyborgs.

You will pick very strong over thrifty in this strategy, as much of your energy will come from starbases anyway. Bots you simply build.Ĭyborgs: they do minerals, energy, and provide a powerful army. Uncanny won't do much for someone who got -100 relations with organics and will likely go to war and gemerate threat, Bulky you'll never have to resettle bots, only cyborgs, who will be the ones colonizing too. You will avoid leader cyborgs in this strategy, focus on immortal high lvl bots instead. That's why you first pick learning algorithms and only later Enhanced Memory. Immortal leaders, they lvl faster with learning algorithms, and you should find ways of expanding leader lvl cap later in the game, for the early to mid they'll quickly go to lvl 5. Decadent/Solitary/Deviants (all three no effects)īots do research and unity.

Stellaris limbo event as driven assimilators